 |
|
Commissioner Marc
Sarnoff: helpin' MAM get another $2 million. |
According
to the Miami City Commission’s newest member, Miami has not
done enough to push for prime investment and exposure
opportunities for the arts. “If we don’t start supporting
our local artists and art venues, then we will never have a
thriving arts community,” said Commissioner Marc Sarnoff
during last Thursday’s commission meeting.
After his 15-minute
speech, he helped reach into the city’s purse to change that
trend.
Sarnoff voted, along with Commissioner Joe Sanchez, to
allocate $2 million to create a new Miami Art Museum at
Bicentennial Park. The $2 million will be added to a pool of
private funds and pledges of about $36 million, as well as
county bond funds of $100 million, for the design and
construction of the new facility. The total project would
amount to $208 million, according to MAM sources — $120
million for construction and design, $70 million for the
museum’s operating endowment and $18 million for
transitional expenses related to the project.
MAM currently has a
24,000-square-foot space at the Miami-Dade County Cultural
Center dedicated to contemporary art with an emphasis on art
of the Americas. The projected size of the new MAM, which is
to be built alongside a new Miami Science Museum at
Bicentennial Park, would be about 125,000 square feet. It is
scheduled to open by 2010.
MAM’s director, Terence
Riley, said the Miami City Commission vote was a major
victory for the art museum, and art education in general.
“The opponents of the Museum Park plan raised every
imaginable objection, all of which were reopened for
thorough and — at times — heated discussion over the past
few weeks. The vote in favor puts these to rest,” Riley
wrote via e-mail the day after the decision.
A “work in progress
exhibit” showcasing the new MAM’s proposed look will be
presented to the public sometime next fall, with additional
public forums on the design to follow, Riley said. The firm
of Herzog and de Meuron has been developing designs for the
new MAM since October.
The $2 million from the
city of Miami comes with conditions, however. Sarnoff
created a list of nine benchmarks that must be met,
including the creation of 500 underground public parking
spaces paid for by the museum, and immediate formation of a
committee to raise between $12 million and $20 million so
the museum can re-landscape and maintain Bicentennial Park.
Sanchez added a requirement for an oversight committee to
assess costs and the project as a whole. Riley believed the
commission’s conditions were “reasonable.”
Sarnoff also approached the decision as a way to save
Bicentennial Park itself. He spoke of visiting the park and
finding the green open space by Bayside mostly frequented by
the homeless. He quoted Jane Jacobs, a prominent urbanist
and writer, who labeled Bicentennial Park a “vacuous park,”
meaning it does not attract the public as much as it should
because of lack of an inviting entry point. “We need to
create magnets within the park, to attract people,” said
Sarnoff. “Bicentennial Park is the place for this museum.”
Sarnoff also presented an
example of a vacuous park that had created the funding
necessary to complete a large and modern museum: The
Milwaukee Museum of Art, which, according to Sarnoff, cost
that city $121 million to construct.
Skepticism and outright
objection were not hard to come by at City Hall, from
Commissioner Michelle Spence-Jones, Commissioner Tomas
Regalado and neighborhood watch groups.
Spence-Jones described it
as “a difficult sale” because she feared “broken promises,”
and wanted an agreement to make sure the museum would give
something back to neighboring areas. Regalado was concerned
the city was not receiving enough for the land it was giving
up.
“We are already giving up
what could be $50 million in land for something that is not
ours. I just don’t know what is in it for the city of
Miami,” Regalado said. He said he has a love for the arts,
but had to object to spending taxpayers’ dollars in this
fashion.
Representatives from
several neighborhood coalitions made clear they did not like
the prospect of spending money that could be headed
elsewhere. Nina West and Judy Sandoval, members of Parks and
Public Spaces and Miami Neighborhoods United, both expressed
concern about the museums’ direction and the fiscal
responsibility of the commissioners who are allotting funds
for a project that has not yet been designed, or finalized.
“We object to the use of
park space and public money and hope you will defer this
issue until all papers concerning this are signed,” Sandoval
said.
Grace Solares, president
of Miami Neighborhoods United, expressed a similar
sentiment. “We ask that you defer this item to September
when you will have all of the documents of this deal … in
front of you,” she said.
This did little to deter
the final decision, which was approved 2-1 — Sarnoff and
Sanchez voting in favor, Regalado against. Commissioners
Michelle Spence-Jones and Angel Gonzalez both were absent
during the vote.
Another theme that
presented itself frequently was the fear of creating another
Carnival Performing Arts Center fiasco, which cost $473
million to build and has run over budget this year by about
$4 million. Sanchez also pointed to the continual
delays in opening the performing arts center (his reason for
the creation of an oversight committee). But despite this
concern, Sanchez still believed the project was well worth
the risk, noting that Miami was competing with other cities
like New York and Paris in the realms of art and culture.
“There is a time when
vision and leadership come together, and that day is today,”
he said.
Happier Days
City
Officials Approve Improved Contract With Sanitation Workers
By
Adrian Carrillo
Life as a sanitation worker for the
city of Miami just got a little easier.
At
last Thursday’s Miami Commission meeting, city officials
announced a new agreement with the city’s sanitation workers
that will induce sweeping changes in wages and benefits.
Commissioner Joe Sanchez labeled it “the best contract the
sanitation workers have negotiated in the city of Miami, in
history.”
The
sanitation workers’ union has been trying to negotiate a
better contract since April 2004. “I was shocked that they
were being treated unfairly with the tremendous job they
do,” said City Commission Chairman Angel Gonzalez on
Thursday. “It’s good that they finally have a good contract;
I am very pleased.”
“We
were getting different treatment than the other departments,
and for a long time we’ve felt shortchanged,” said Bob
Simmons, president of the Florida Public Employees Council
79, who has worked for the city more than 16 years.
He
conceded that progress only really started when Hector
Mirabile, the city’s deputy director of employee relations,
began working with the union about seven months ago.
“The previous contract was extremely substandard,” Mirabile
said. “So we tried our hardest to get the best package we
could possibly get.”
The
changes are effective immediately but range across two
different contracts the union has with the city of Miami —
the current one, which started on Oct. 1, 2004 and will last
to Sept. 30, 2007; and a future agreement from Oct. 1, 2007
to Sept. 30, 2010. The substantive revisions include a total
wage increase of six percent over the first three years of
the first contract, and a nine percent increase over the
three years of the second contract. Pay would also be
restructured in such a way that after a certain number of
years, a “step” increase of 2.5 percent would be credited.
Before negotiations, sick leave was limited to 600 hours,
with no pay afterward. Now, the number is 750 hours, but
without a limit; any hours accumulated after that would be
granted at 50 percent and either paid in cash or credited to
vacation leave.
Commissioner Marc Sarnoff praised the negotiations, and
recounted a time when he lived in New York during a
sanitation workers’ strike. “There was no garbage pickup for
one and a half months. I’m glad we didn’t get to that point,
and resolved the dispute,” he chuckled.
Simmons always believed the best approach with the city was
to be “cooperative rather than adversarial” to achieve their
goals, even if it was taking longer than the negotiating
team wanted.
The
workmers’ compensation would be slightly better than state
law, at 80 percent of the base wage. Also, under the old
contract, an employee who was in an accident had to undergo
substance abuse and alcohol testing and wait for the results
before returning to work — using their vacation time for the
work they missed. “I had fellow employees that would lose a
week of their vacation time just waiting for a test to come
back negative,” Simmons said. With this new contract,
employees would be on administrative leave while undergoing
these tests. Another change is that if employees need to be
immediately relieved for a legitimate reason, they will
continue to be paid.
Even
the union sucked up some of the costs to get the contract
finalized, agreeing to “assist the city in curtailing
excessive healthcare costs by sharing increased percentages
of premium costs,” according to a release from the city’s
Office of Communications. “It really was a team effort, and
I’m absolutely proud of the progress,” Mirabile said. When
asked if Sanchez’s comment about this being the best union
agreement in the history of the city of Miami was accurate,
Mirabile answered without hesitation: “That is completely
factual.”
Another key member of the negotiating process was Michelle
Piña, the senior
assistant to the city manager, whose role was to keep City
Manager Pedro Hernandez briefed and to assist Mirabile in
facilitating the negotiations.
“The
city staff worked very long hours and put all their muscle
and heart into it because we knew how important this union
was for the city manager,” said Piña. “This was truly a team
effort.”
When
asked about future contract talks past the year 2010, Piña
believed the city could stay consistent with the current
revisions.
“Both
the city and the union have set a new tone and standard.
Hopefully in 2010 we will be able to uphold it and reach an
amicable agreement,” she said.
Commissioner Michelle Spence-Jones joined in the praise,
saying that she finally thought the sanitation workers, a
group of some of the hardest-working people, were getting a
fair deal. She was not all smiles, however, speaking of the
“deplorable conditions of the facility” where solid waste
employees work. She spoke of the need to upgrade that
facility and its showering unit, adding “if anyone needs to
be able to have a good, clean shower in this city, it should
be the garbage pick-up personnel. They should have the best
showers.”
Surfside
The Assembly Zone
New Ordinance Tailor-Made for Synagogue That Once Sued Town
By
Evan Berkowitz
 |
|
The ordinance symbolizes a new
era of cooperation with Surfside's religious
institutions, according to the town’s vice
mayor. Photo by Andrew Goldstein |
The Surfside Town Commission
unanimously passed an ordinance dealing with public assembly
and religious institutions, during a meeting held June 12.
The
ordinance was meant to accommodate Young Israel of Bal
Harbour, a synagogue that previous town governments
litigated against in conjunction with another temple,
Midrash Sephardi, for nearly a decade. The two temples
wanted to operate in a bank building at 9592 Harding Ave.
However, Surfside officials argued that the building was not
zoned for religious use. The courts ruled in favor of the
synagogues based on a statute called the Religious Land Use
and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which Congress
passed in 2000.
Surfside only recently settled the case, and was forced to
pay both temples’ legal fees amounting to more than $1.5
million. “At Vice Mayor Weinberg’s request, we have done an
analysis of how we could remedy the legislation that was in
place prior to this litigation that resulted in a large loss
for the town,” said Town Attorney Lynn M. Dannheisser. Mayor
Charles Burkett said the legislation would help avoid
“future problems” regarding similar zoning issues.
Young
Israel plans to build a two-story synagogue on two empty
lots, one at 9580 Abbott Ave., the other on Byron Avenue
west of and adjacent to the first; both front on 96th
Street. The possibility of the temple expanding its site
south by buying two private homes was discussed at previous
meetings, but Stan Price, the synagogue’s attorney, said
they were no longer interested in doing that. “This [zoning]
map is sufficient for the purposes of Young Israel,” he
said.
The
three areas allowed for public assembly in Surfside will be
96th Street, Harding Avenue and Collins Avenue. In the
lawsuit, the town’s different treatment of religious
assemblies compared to secular assemblies or organizations
was ruled discriminatory. Dannheisser said the new ordinance
standardizes treatments, and also regulates home assemblies.
Price
apologized for “characterizations that were made at the last
meeting.” The lawyer said he did not have a proper survey of
the 96th Street area when he referred to the ordinance as
“anti-RLUIPA.”
But
Price did complain that the new ordinance does not address
several issues relating to the height of synagogues and
their required setbacks. “We’d also like you to consider
your parking requirements,” he said. Price argued that
Orthodox Jews, like the congregants of Young Israel, are
required by religious law not to drive on the Sabbath;
therefore fewer car parking spaces should be needed. He
noted that Bal Harbour passed an ordinance taking into
account this unique characteristic of religious Jews.
Commissioner Marc Imberman
said he was not in favor of creating special parking
requirements “based on the particular practices of any
group.” However, he did note that there was a public parking
lot almost adjacent to the 96th Street lots and said some of
those slots could be reserved for Young Israel’s use.
|