 |
|
Frank Del Vecchio doesn’t trust the developers of
the proposed Bijou at Third and Ocean Drive. Will a
proposed ordinance put a damper on their plans?
Photo by Erik Bojnansky |
Residents of the in-vogue South of
Fifth neighborhood have joined together to battle a proposed
oceanfront hotel that they say is nothing more than a
“Trojan horse” with the purpose of ushering in another loud
restaurant and nightclub to their peaceful residential
enclave.
Last
summer developer Zedek Associates was granted approval from
the Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board to build a
luxury condominium, the Bijou, at 315-321 Ocean Drive, on
the site of the historic but dilapidated Simone Hotel. The
severe downturn in South Florida’s condominium market,
though, prompted the developer to change the project to a
130-room boutique hotel.
On
the surface, the basic structure of the yet-to-be-approved
hotel is very similar to the already vetted condominium. But
activist Frank Del Vecchio, who lives less than 20 feet from
the project, decided to take a closer look. He enlisted the
help of renowned architect Jan Hochstim to review the plans.
Hochstim, whose family has owned a condominium since 1968 in
the same building as Del Vecchio, 301 Ocean Drive, concluded
that the plans submitted to the HPB were misleading, and the
hotel would double as a nightclub and make life unbearable
for its neighbors.
Armed with Hochstim’s research, Del Vecchio began rallying
the troops. He contacted the newly formed South of Fifth
Neighborhood Association, SOFNA. It put Bijou on the agenda
of its July 9 board meeting held at the Continuum, 100 South
Pointe Drive. About 40 people attended the meeting,
including Commissioners Michael Gongora, Matti Bower and
Saul Gross. Commission candidate hopeful Jonah Wolfson was
also there.
“How
would you feel if a Nikki Beach-type operation would open 15
feet from you?” Del Vecchio asked SOFNA meeting attendees.
Del
Vecchio spoke about what he called the “accessory use
loophole” in the historic district’s zoning code. Accessory
use means hotel restaurants or bars in this district are
supposed to only be large enough to serve their hotel guests
and not be the main business. Del Vecchio said the rule is
exploited by developers, and held up Prime 112 in the
historic Browns Hotel at 112 Ocean Drive as an example. The
Browns Hotel has nine rooms and a booming restaurant,
without any parking. Neighbors complain about the constant
line of taxis and cars outside the restaurant, and the
valets who race through the neighborhood competing with
residents for parking spaces. Residents of the Concord House
Condominium, which sits just across the back alley from
Prime 112, about 25 feet away, have battled with the city
and the restaurant over the smelly garbage and frequent
trash pickup, as well as loud employees. Del Vecchio also
mentioned Devito South Beach at 150 Ocean Drive, the former
site of Joia, as an abuse of the accessory use zoning.
Gross was praised for having put on the July 11 commission
meeting agenda a discussion about closing the accessory use
loophole. The commission ended up referring the amendment to
the Planning Board. Gross told the SunPost he hopes
the item makes it onto their Aug. 28 agenda.
The
amendment to the code governing permitted uses in the South
Pointe residential neighborhood that the Planning Board will
discuss reads: “In the R-PS1, 2, 3 and 4 districts, a
restaurant or bar which is an accessory use to a main
permitted use, shall be limited to one seat for every two
hotel rooms or apartment. Validly licensed existing
accessory use establishments with more seats as of the date
hereof than would be permitted under this provision, shall
be considered legal but non-conforming.”
Gross told the SunPost that below Fifth Street on
Ocean Drive, restaurants and bars are only allowed as
accessory uses.
“Prime 112 is a great business, but it’s supposed to go in a
commercial zone, not a residential zone,” Gross said. If his
code amendment passes, existing businesses like Prime 112
and Devito South Beach would be grandfathered in.
The
SOFNA board voted to oppose Bijou by recommending the
Historic Preservation Board turn down its request for
approval.
“We
are convinced that this is a nightclub masquerading as a
hotel,” SOFNA President Gerald Posner said.
The
next morning, July 10, Del Vecchio showed up at Miami Beach
City Hall for the Historic Preservation Board meeting backed
by more than 30 people in tow.
The
meeting was a tense, controversial showdown between lawyers
from the start. In one corner were Del Vecchio and attorney
Kent Harrison Robbins fighting to stop Bijou. In the
opposite corner, attorney Carter McDowell represented Zedek
Associates. Refereeing was Assistant City Attorney Gary
Held. At one point in the hearing, Del Vecchio quipped, “God
save us from attorneys.”
The
hearing nearly ended before it even started. The Planning
Department’s liaison to the HPB, Thomas Mooney, announced
that board member Erica Brigham owns an apartment at 301
Ocean Drive, and therefore had a possible conflict of
interest, and at the very least, an appearance of one. She
could recuse herself from the item, but then there would not
be a quorum to hold a vote. The board is required to have
five of seven members present for a vote. Diane Downs and
James Donnelly were already absent.
Held
recommended that the board postpone the item until its next
meeting, but Del Vecchio and Robbins countered that they had
22 people prepared to speak, many of whom were busy and
important and wouldn’t necessarily be able to come again.
Waiting to testify were Zoa Martinez, a two-time Emmy award
winner who would be heading to Hollywood after the meeting
to do a makeover of Star Jones. Caroline Miller, a former
editor of New York magazine, had flown into
town for the meeting; and Dan Wakefield, writer in residence
at Florida International University, had taken the day off
to be there. Robbins argued they could have the hearing for
the purpose of preserving testimony, and then hold the vote
in September, but McDowell said doing so could cause
problems down the line.
“You
have a quorum for the purpose of a meeting, but I don’t know
that you do have a quorum for the purpose of a
hearing for a certificate of appropriateness,” McDowell
said. He explained that he didn’t want to leave a procedural
challenge open.
Board member Simon Nemni said he didn’t want to waste
people’s time by possibly having to hold the entire hearing
over again at a later date. He made a motion to postpone the
hearing. No one seconded his motion, and Del Vecchio and
Robbins’ people were able to give their testimonies. The
issues they attempted to address were compatibility of the
Bijou with the surrounding properties, relationship to
structure and features of the district and the purpose for
which the district was created, and the function of the
development in relation to the site, adjacent structure and
surrounding community.
The
plans presented by Zedek Associates proposed a hotel with
130 rooms and a 125-seat restaurant. Hochstim attempted to
show the board that the plans were misleading. Hochstim
counted 345 seats between the restaurant and bar and pool
area, and through careful recalculation showed the hotel’s
public outdoor space could actually, by code, accommodate
over 1000 people.
“We
can have a total of 995 people eating and drinking and
socializing inside and outside, 19.5 feet from our
building,” Hochstim said to applause. “That’s the size of a
car space. And then 40 people facing Ocean Drive.”
McDowell protested the implication.
“If
I might, that’s the maximum possible occupancy that
you can use,” McDowell replied.
Arthur Marcus of the Miami Design Preservation League also
spoke against approving the project.
“We
believe that this project, this nightclub with an accessory
use hotel, will diminish the defining historic neighborhood
character of this district,” Marcus said. “I mean this is
very similar to the kind of concept that operates right now
at the Skybar at the Shore Club, or even at the new Regent
hotel on [1455] Ocean Drive.”
Jo
Manning, who lives at 1460 Ocean Drive, just north of the
Regent, talked about being duped into supporting the
project, only to regret it.
“On
our north end of Ocean Drive we’ve had serious issues with
an open bar in a condominium hotel, the Regent South Beach,”
Manning said. “This has morphed into a mini nightclub over
the last several months, with loud music and concomitant
noise of too many patrons milling in an area intended to be
a space to have a drink while waiting to be seated at a
restaurant.” This open bar is 10 feet from a condominium and
butts against its windows.
McDowell had architect Kobi Karp present his plans for the
Bijou, and had a sound expert talk about all the
sound-mitigating devices like trellises and special material
meant to contain the sound within the building.
“There will not be a nightclub on this piece of property,”
McDowell said. “This is intended to be an accessory
restaurant lounge to serve a boutique hotel. That simple.”
When
all the testimony was heard, HPB members had a chance to
offer final comments.
“Obviously what professor Hochstim has demonstrated beyond a
rereading of the plan is that they are mislabeling the
square footage on the second level plan by at least 1,500
square feet in some areas, and that is unacceptable and I’m
surprised that was not actually coded before by staff,” HPB
member Jean-Francois LeJeune said.
Board Chairman Allan Hall also expressed problems with the
Zedek’s presentation.
“I
don’t think it’s a business as usual site,” Hall said. “And
I think that you’re going to have to convince this board
member that there will not be the sound issues that the
community spoke to.”
The
Bijou will be discussed and voted on at the Sept. 11
Historic Preservation Board meeting. Robbins told the
SunPost that if Gross’ accessory use amendment makes in
on the Aug. 28 Planning Board agenda, and becomes zoning in
progress, it will greatly help his case against Bijou and be
a major victory for residents, he believes.
“That would be substantial,” Robbins said.
Comments? E-mail
letters@miamisunpost.com.