 |
|
Mike Suarez: Self-proclaimed anti-development
candidate |
By Angie Hargot
The bulk of District 1 candidate
Michel “Mike” Suarez’s contributions this time around came
from the amorphous “businessman” occupation listing — around
42 percent to be exact. According to one election official,
those designations don’t really come under scrutiny unless
the contribution is more than $100. Unfortunately for
Suarez’s bottom line, most of his contributions were not
over that amount.
A
proclaimed candidate since December 2006 (the official
candidate qualifying period is between Sept. 7 and 22,
2007), Suarez has so far amassed $58,798, a sum that pales
in comparison to opponent Angel Gonzalez’s campaign treasure
chest of $347,205 (to date). Both numbers will likely grow
by Oct. 5, when the next set of candidates’ campaign reports
is due. As SunPost spoke to Suarez by phone, he was
bustling about town, picking up contribution checks.
Suarez has a few theories for the disparity in contributions
— for one, he isn’t in anyone’s pocket, he says.
And
“it’s my first time entering politics,” Suarez said. He
added that he did serve on Miami’s Code Enforcement Board as
a volunteer.
“I’m
basically a businessman.” To clarify, Suarez explained he is
a bail bondsman with Ace Bonding in Miami. He’s not a
partner or a shareholder — but “an entrepreneur” with the
company, he said.
Suarez, 31, graduated in 2002 from St. Thomas University
with a degree in management.
He
characterizes his platform as “anti-development” and said he
doesn’t want to see the “up-zone of the Miami area.” He does
not favor Miami 21, which he also criticized for having a
failed communication system. Suarez said that at a recent
Miami 21 community meeting he attended “there were seven
people there. A lot of people had not been notified.”
He
described himself as “grassroots organization on the side of
residential property owners. There’s an imbalance in the
housing market.”
Suarez’s parents arrived in Miami from Cuba when he was just
four years old.
“They
were hard-working people and they saved money. I went
through college and was able to afford a one-bedroom
apartment in a building built in 1972. It drove me to run
for public office. If we don’t participate we won’t change
anything.”
County records show the 756-square-foot apartment Suarez and
his wife own was purchased in late 2006 for $160,000.
Suarez said of opponent Angel Gonzalez: “His financial
statements show his contributions come from lobbyists,
developers and contractors — he’s supported by special
interests.” Referring to contributions listed in Gonzalez’s
campaign treasurers’ reports from California, New York and
elsewhere outside of Florida, he noted, “Many of them are
not even from Florida.”
Suarez said he recently went up against Gonzalez in a local
radio debate. “I asked him how he could possibly represent
the neighborhoods when he’s basically in the pockets of
special interests. He doesn’t represent hard-working people.
Some people want to convert Miami into a 24-hour New York
City.”
As
for the stated vagueness of Suarez’s contributors, Dwight
Danie, the city of Miami’s elections coordinator, said
listing undefined professions in campaign reports is nothing
new, nor is it against the rules — per se — though it
sometimes sends up a red flag.
“The
occupations say ‘executive’ or ‘businessman,’” Danie said.
“The term is vague. I look at those.” But there haven’t been
any complaints about this election pertaining to fraud that
he can see from the files, aside from minor discrepancies in
how contributions are coded. In fact, Suarez had one such
discrepancy, Danie said. An item that was reported as a
“check” should have been coded otherwise. Danie sent out a
letter to the campaign that the item was coded incorrectly.
“I
eyeball the reports. I return the check or they can amend it
in some way. But I don’t have the ability to go into bank
accounts.”
That’s a job for the Florida Elections Commission, Danie
said, if that flag gets raised via a complaint.
He
added that some new regulations pertaining to campaign
finance are expected in January. “It will make it harder for
anyone to file a complaint,” he said. Danie said once the
new rules take effect, “someone would have to have firsthand
knowledge to file a complaint” about campaign finance
discrepancies, adding that discrepancies, like coding
errors, are not uncommon.
Suarez listed among his biggest not-necessarily-financial
supporters his wife, Christina Suarez, a mental health
counselor; retired Broward Fire Chief Charles V. “Chuck”
Lanza (one of Suarez’s college professors); and a handful of
residents’ organizations like Miami Neighborhoods United,
which he said support his grassroots ideals.
Then
there are a few big names in local politics that appear in
this quarter’s $4,579 in contributions. Frank Rollason, the
former director of the Community Redevelopment Agency who
ran for District 2 commissioner in 2006, gave Suarez’s
campaign $250. (Rollason also identified himself as a
“businessman.”) Self-proclaimed (on Suarez’s list of
contributors) “Community activist” and Planning Advisory
Board member Nina West also chipped in $250. Xavier Suarez
(no relation), who used the more specific “attorney/former
mayor” identification, gave Suarez $100.
Anti-development Morningside activist Elvis Cruz gave Suarez
$500, listing “firefighter” as his occupation. Cruz scored a
win for the anti-development platform last month, when the
3rd District Court of Appeals denied an appeal by developers
that would have paved the way for two towering condos to be
built in his neighborhood.
Other
names of note on this quarter’s report:
Luis Fernandez,
attorney for the Vizcaya/Roads Homeowners Association, which
went before the Miami City Commission just last month to
battle the proposed 11-story Lumiere development that
threatens to cast the high-rise shadow on their Shenandoah
neighborhood. Fernandez pitched in $350 to Suarez’s
campaign.
Richard Bunnell,
as in oldest-name-in-marine-construction Bunnell, who has
been in the news over the years for efforts to clean up the
polluted Miami River, gave Suarez’s campaign $100.
The second
quarter treasurer’s report also sheds light on Suarez’s
campaign practices — in the three quarters he has been
collecting contributions, this is the first time he’s
reported any expenditures: $14,597 for ads, a media
consultant, some voter lists and a few other expenses.
“This
election is going to be the young person against the old
establishment,” Suarez promised. “People say they want new
faces in local government — we’re going to question if
democracy really works. The guy I’m running against was
arrested for voter fraud. On the one hand government wants
to talk about ethics.…
“I’m
going to stand up for what I believe in. A lot of people
want change. They say, ‘it’s terrible what’s going on in
local government,’ but [they say that they] do business with
Angel Gonzalez,” he added. “I love talking to people.
[Policy] is not about what I want or what you want. It’s
what the residents want. That’s why they call it public
service.”
Comments?
E-mail
angie@miamisunpost.com.