|
Miami-Dade
Help Wanted
County may
drop residency requirement for job slots
By Cynthia
Archbold
 |
|
Corinne Brody |
Good
help — especially from highly skilled professionals who live in
Miami-Dade County — is hard to find these days.
That’s what several
Miami-Dade County supervisors struggling to fill professional
positions in their departments told the Budget and Finance
Committee on Tuesday, when they urged the panel to eliminate one
recruitment obstacle — a rule requiring most county workers to
live here.
The 1998 Miami-Dade County
law currently requires 13,488 county employees to reside in the
county when they are hired or sign an agreement to move here
within 15 months. About 7,595 county employees are exempt from
the rule, including sworn officers in the Miami-Dade Police
Department and Corrections and Rehabilitations, Miami-Dade Fire
Rescue personnel (including the dispatchers) and employees hired
before the 1998 law went into effect. Miami-Dade County is one
of only three in the state with such residency requirements.
“Today, in the job market we
are experiencing significant difficulties in certain
classifications, things like auditors, accountants, finance
people, planners, some of our skilled trades,” said Interim
Miami-Dade County Human Resources Director Corinne Brody.
She said it’s also almost
impossible to hire enough qualified architects, engineers,
information technology, land surveyors and construction
supervisors to fill key positions — hence the need to recruit
professionals from outside the county. And the shortage of
qualified employees will get worse by 2013, according to
statistics from the Florida Research and Economic Database.
“When you look at some of the
forecasts in the future for Florida’s economy in general, it’s
expected that some of those classifications are actually going
to see a 10 percent increase in demand,” Brody said. “So it
becomes a question in the future if there are new folks in the
marketplace who we can attract to come to work for us.”
The talent shortage is not
limited to the county; Brody said it’s a national problem caused
by a shrinking qualified labor pool, retirement of baby boomers,
worker mobility and “demands for work/life balance.”
Besides, the outside
candidates the county does recruit can’t afford to live here.
“The economy here in Dade
County, the way things are escalating, the cost of homes, the
cost of everything associated with living here — a lot of our
employees really cannot afford to live here anymore,” said Leon
Fuller, a representative of county employees who asked the
committee to repeal the residency rule. “I would support this
because some of our departments where there are special
positions — the fire department and some other departments —
there are actually vacancies that can’t be filled simply because
there is no one in Dade County who can fill these positions.”
Richard Ellis, president of
the Government Supervisors Association of Florida, would also
like to see the rule repealed. “I know good employees who could
not come because of the cost of relocation; they’re unable to
move to Miami-Dade County,” he said.
Brody reassured Commissioner
Jose Pepe Diaz that repealing the residency rule “would not
affect the current job pipeline and placement process going on
today.” She said she would draft wording in the proposal to
ensure local job applicants with the required credentials are
given first consideration over outsiders.
The budget and finance
committee voted unanimously to recommend repealing the residency
requirement, leaving it to the Miami-Dade County Commission to
decide the issue at a later date.
Ironically, the panel
congratulated Brody on her plans to travel the world, leaving
her position with the county for good as of Friday. The county
is conducting a national search to fill the vacant human
resources director position.
home
Miami
The Show Must Go On
Coconut
Grove Playhouse en route to recovery
By Claudio
Mendonca
 |
|
The Coconut Grove Playhouse |
After
sitting dark for nearly a year, the Coconut Grove Playhouse is
on the verge of being reopened.
The theater, located on the
corner of Charles Avenue and Main Highway, lowered its curtains
last year because of an estimated $4 million of debt. However,
its board of directors has asked both public and private
officials in the last few months for debt relief and help with
renovations so it can reinaugurate the historic theater in early
2008, board members told the Coconut Grove Village Council last
week.
In addition to paying off
playhouse debt, the board is working to compensate former
employees who are still owed outstanding severance and vacation
time payments.
“Miami-Dade County has $20
million in bonds available for renovations,” said Michael
Spring, director of the Miami-Dade County Department of Cultural
Affairs, one of its strongest public supporters.
The playhouse board wants to
forge an agreement with partners in education to help operate
the theater, enhance its programming and bring new year-round
learning programs to the playhouse.
County government also
created a voucher program that will allow playhouse subscribers
to enjoy free theater on three South Florida stages: Carnival
Center for the Performing Arts, the University of Miami’s Jerry
Herman Ring Theatre and Palm Beach Dramaworks.
In the near term, the board
of directors plans to launch a public planning process, which
would take three to six months, to catch the attention of
potential investors.
“The playhouse is committed
to launch a public process to enable all of its stakeholders,
the public, theater community, elected officials, creditors,
historic preservationists and area merchants to help shape its
future,” according to a playhouse statement.
“In our first few meetings,
residents were very supportive,” said Shelly Spivack, speaking
on behalf of the playhouse board.
One of the playhouse’s
private supporters is the Aries Development Group LLC and its
principal, Rick Kalwani. Aries has already donated $470,000 to
avoid a foreclosure auction of playhouse property known as the
“bicycle shop.”
Aries Development took over
the parking lot adjacent to the theater after the Miami Parking
Authority terminated its management lease when the playhouse
shut down. The parking lot is now being managed by Paradise
Parking Systems, an Aries affiliate. The lot will remain open to
the public but fees are expected to be higher than when parking
was managed by the public entity.
Coconut Grove Village Council
member Felice Dubin said “she is very happy and pleased with the
resurgence of the playhouse,” which was inaugurated in 1926 as a
movie theater and began showing live performances in 1956. David
Collins, another council member, said it is part of the
“community soul.”
home
Miami Beach
Wall of Spite
Historic preservation board members are urged to preserve
history, no matter how spiteful
By Angie
Hargot
 |
|
The Fontainebleau Hotel:
Whoever said hoteliers were nice guys? |
Designers
and representatives for the Fontainebleau Hotel were sent back
to the drawing board Tuesday after “insulting” Miami Beach
Historic Preservation Board Chair Allan Hall.
Fontainebleau Florida Hotel,
a limited liability company headed by developer Jeffrey Soffer,
requested modifications to the exterior wall of the north hotel
tower — fittingly called a “spite wall” — as part of a $500
million redevelopment project.
The developer first requested
to demolish the north hotel tower in 2005. However, in May 2006,
with the project under close scrutiny, the historic preservation
board approved major project revisions that retained the north
tower, allowing the construction of a new seven-story building
with a ballroom and meeting rooms adjacent to the existing
hotel.
Since then, Fontainebleau
plans have undergone a slew of modifications, including changes
to the Tropigala Theater, the historic lobby, porte-cochere and
the “cheese wall,” a low-rise design feature on one side of the
building with large portholes. The developer also applied for
less-contentious modifications to the south building that
included the approved parking garage project and some
landscaping issues.
On Tuesday, architect John
Nichols outlined the proposed window changes for the north tower
and the possible inclusion of a glass tile mosaic, visually
in-line with the neighboring Eden Roc Resort.
But Hall felt Nichols’
presentation was ill-prepared, as the board was not given
renderings of the proposed changes.
“I’m confused,” Hall said,
with no trace of jest. “We are being asked to vote on something
that we don’t have a drawing of? I’m offended.”
The 17-story, 330-room tower
was added to the Morris Lapidus-designed Fontainebleau in 1962,
casting a building-sized shadow directly over the pool area of
the now-competing Lapidus-designed Eden Roc next door. The side
of the tower facing the newly built Eden Roc, known as the
“spite wall,” had just one window — in Fontainebleau developer
Ben Novak’s penthouse apartment. The shadow was reportedly
intended to hinder the resort neighbor’s business.
Although the prospect of
adding windows to the eccentrically “spiteful” building surfaced
in recent years, it may not be structurally feasible to carve
windows into the building as first thought.
On Tuesday, Hall
chided Nichols for presenting the project without renderings.
“We’ve continued this item a
number of times,” Hall said. “I’d like to see what we’re voting
on.”
Fontainebleau attorney Carter
McDowell maintained that the renderings weren’t submitted
because the project’s organizers didn’t receive the staff report
until the Friday before the meeting. He asked the board for
suggestions on what to bring back.
Board member Norberto
Rosenstein, a registered architect, saw the wall as an
opportunity to do something impressive. “You’ve got a blank
piece of paper here,” Rosenstein said of the building’s
potential.
One board member jokingly
suggested that the developers paint a mural on the controversial
wall depicting the history of the “spite” issue — an idea that
drew chuckles from other officials.
Board member James “Jeff”
Donnelly, a long-standing member of the Miami Design
Preservation League who has led and created the curriculum for
walking explorations of Miami Beach architecture for almost a
decade, acknowledged the wall was a part of the city’s history.
“How will people know how
terrible the ‘spite wall’ was if they can’t see it?” he asked.
“All of this is really a part of history in Miami Beach. The
owner wanted to destroy the business of the guy to the north. We
need to find a way that would be obvious to the viewer what the
story was.”
William H. Cary, design
director for the city’s preservation and neighborhood planning
division, added that the piece of local architectural history
“shows how nasty man can be to his fellow man.”
In light of the impending
continuance, McDowell raised concerns about the increased costs
of delay.
“We’re not holding you up,”
Cary replied. “We’ve had this discussion with the Fontainebleau
for four or five months. So this is not the first time you’re
hearing it.”
home
Bay Harbor Islands
Dock Quagmire
Clashing
regulations prove problematic for homeowners rebuilding their
hurricane-damaged
docks
By Erik
Bojnansky
Bay
Harbor Islands homeowners who lost waterfront docks to Hurricane
Wilma are finding competing government regulations to be
sturdier and far more unyielding than their properties.
Now, the clashing rules are
forcing many people to seek variances to rebuild their boat
docks.
Regulations from Miami-Dade’s
Department of Environmental Resource Management forbid digging
in environmentally sensitive sea grass areas commonly found in
Biscayne Bay and Indian Creek Lake. That means docks must extend
beyond the sea grass to place the pilings in deeper water. Yet,
Bay Harbor’s current ordinance only allows docks 8 feet long, so
residents must ask for variances to comply with the county
rules.
“They want a dock that will
do less environmental damage to the sands and silts,” said
Michael Miller, a planning consultant.
Many of Bay Harbor’s homes on
the West Island, though, were built in the 1940s and 1950s
before the county’s environmental resource department was
created, Miller said. And to rebuild the docks Wilma swept away
in 2005, homeowners must conform to new environmental
regulations set out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
county.
To satisfy those demands,
Efrain and Terry Jove, of 9826 W. Broadview Drive, needed to
build a dock 16 feet wide. John Brussel of 9405 E. Bay Harbor
Drive had to get four variances to build a dock and boat lift
“at least 25 feet out,” Miller said.
The Joves’ application was
approved by the Bay Harbor Islands Town Council by a vote of
6-1, with Councilman Isaac Salver dissenting. But council
members said the size of Brussel’s dock and boat lift was far
out of scale. Mayor Peter Lynch asked Brussel if he wanted to
redesign the dock to get it “closer to the box” — i.e. closer to
town code.
“Yes,” Brussel answered.
“That’s a wise decision,”
Lynch said.
Lynch, though, felt the town
should create a new ordinance so homeowners wishing to rebuild
their docks wouldn’t have to ask for town variances.
“I’m sure we can put together
something,” Town Attorney Frank Simone said.
But Salver said the town
should first talk with the county’s environmental resource
management department, commonly referred to as DERM. “Rather
than create an ordinance to complicate [matters] … we need to
take a step back … and meet with DERM.”
Lynch was doubtful that the
department would budge, however. Although the agency examines
applicants’ waterfront properties to determine precise
requirements, it does not provide specific standards on how the
docks should be built. “DERM is not telling you how to build
this type or that type of dock,” Lynch said.
Besides drafting an
ordinance, Lynch said town officials would reach out to the
county department for guidance. He also said its officials were
“stubborn” and unlikely to compromise on their site-specific
approvals. It took three and a half years to get the permits to
rebuild Haulover Marina, he said. “There are so many
requirements.”
home
Surfside
Save the Sea Grass!
Town
commission supports protecting waterways, but differs on how to
name things
By William
Alton
The
Surfside Town Commission unanimously passed a marine structure
ordinance Tuesday that will help protect sea grass in Biscayne
Bay against further damage.
The ordinance permits the
extension of boat docks from 20 feet to 35 feet into the bay, to
bypass undamaged sea grass.
“We have sea grass that goes
out beyond 20 feet [from shore],” Town Manager W.D. Higginbotham
Jr. said. “The environmental concern is that when the dock only
goes out 20 feet for a boat, it’s going to damage the underlying
sea grass. So it’s important that we protect it.”
Sea grass, sometimes referred
to as “ecosystem engineers,” is in global decline due in large
part to human development. It is an important source of oxygen,
helps prevent coastal erosion, provides a habitat for marine
wildlife and exists as a vital link in the food chain.
The Web site of the
Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources
Management explains that “the disruption of the natural bay
bottom has destroyed the sea grass habitat that supported
hundreds of fish and invertebrate species.”
Sea grass is especially
important to Biscayne Bay’s ecology because it helps stabilize
sediments, keeping the water clearer than it otherwise might be.
Sea grass also provides food and hiding places for the countless
marine creatures that attract tourists.
The projection of boating
docks, piers and mooring piles will be limited to 35 feet from
shore in Biscayne Bay, 10 feet in Indian Creek and 15 feet in
Point Lake. In the event of a narrow waterway, the ordinance
stipulates that no dock or pier can project more than 10 percent
of the width of that waterway.
Specified in the amendment,
these figures were subject to the approval of the county
department and the U.S. Corps of Engineers.
Town Planner Sarah Sinatra
said the dimensions specified in the ordinance will prevent
further harm to the sea grass by keeping boats at a distance,
while also maintaining boater safety. She said the
specifications will work to protect boaters from colliding with
protruding docks.
Despite agreeing on the
marine structure regulations, the Town Commission struggled to
come up with a uniform way to name public facilities.
Commissioner Mark Blumstein
complained there was a lack of guidelines on how the town goes
about naming streets, parks or facilities. So he proposed an
ordinance on “naming, renaming and co-designation of town
facilities, roads or property.”
Blumstein’s ordinance stemmed
from the previous government’s renaming of 96th Street Park to
Paul Novack Park. Novack was mayor of Surfside for 12 years
prior to his retirement in 2004. A Town Commission consisting of
Novack’s allies, headed by Mayor Tim Will, renamed the park
after Novack later that year.
However, a new commission
headed by Mayor Charles Burkett, took power in 2006 — one that
was critical of Novack’s policies. In July 2006, they stripped
Novack’s name from the park.
Imberman’s colleagues agreed
that a uniform procedure is needed for naming streets and
facilities, but they did not agree on one method. There was much
deliberation whether the honor should be posthumous or for the
living, voted as referendum by the public or separately by the
commission. Mayor Charles Burkett then suggested that
commissioners refer any proposals on how to rename public
property or facilities to Town Attorney Lynn M. Dannheiser, who
will condense them for the next town meeting Nov. 6.
home
Aventura
If You Build it, the County Will Pay
City
approves library-performing arts center deal
By Randy
Abraham
The
Aventura City Commission approved an interlocal agreement with
Miami-Dade County on Oct. 2 to reconstruct the county’s
Northeast Library branch at 2930 Aventura Blvd.
The city agreed to draw up
plans for the county library, which was slated for renovation
when Hurricane Wilma severely damaged it in 2005, that integrate
a multipurpose building that can also serve as a performing arts
space. It will fund the performing arts center project with the
$4.7 million proceeds of a county bond.
The county, which will have
final design approval, will pay for the construction,
maintenance and operation of the library.
Mayor Susan Gottlieb said she
was pleased at the agreement, which comes more than a year after
the city, impatient with the pace of the library’s
reconstruction, requested to take control of the project. In
January, the city selected the firm of P.G.A.L., in association
with William Rawn Associates, to draw up the plans. The old
library building should be demolished within two months; the new
building will take about two years to plan and construct.
“We’re ready to go forward,”
said Gottlieb.
home
Concurrency Time
Aventura officials to examine educational infrastructure
By Randy
Abraham
Aventura
city planners will soon consider the impact of new construction
on local schools’ capacity to accommodate additional students,
as state law requires them to do.
City commissioners agreed
Oct. 2 to amend the city’s new growth management regulations
with a section addressing the “education element” of its
infrastructure.
A 2005 amendment to Florida’s
growth management legislation directed local governments to
enact concurrency management ordinances. As defined by the
state, concurrency is “a growth management concept intended to
ensure that the necessary public facilities and services are
available concurrent with the impacts of development.” Joanne
Carr, the city’s planning director, said Aventura is prepared.
The city inked an interlocal agreement with the Miami-Dade
School Board and, in 2005, issued an evaluation and appraisal
report with policy updates to the comprehensive plan. “The state
wants to make sure inter-governmental cooperation is happening
with the school board. We’re doing everything the Legislature
envisions,” said Carr.
As part of the agreement with
the public school district, as of Jan. 1 all nonvested and
nonexempt proposals for residential subdivisions will need to
obtain school concurrency review. The concurrency review will
replace the school board’s policy of voluntary mitigation, Carr
wrote in a memo to elected officials, and is intended to
determine if there is sufficient capacity at nearby affected
schools.
home |