Miami Beach Battle

Election drama peaked on Tuesday, and it's far from over.

 

Incumbents Rule

Three Miami City Commissioners get re-elected. Surprise, surprise.

 

Tobacco Road Anniversary

Miami-Dade County’s oldest bar will celebrate its 95th anniversary with a 10-hour party.

 

NEWS

 

Miami

The Lyric Theater wants to grow but it needs to build upon city-owned land to do it. And

when it comes to renovating historic churches in Overtown, there is no such thing as separation of church and state.

 

Miami Beach

A developer finds out just how critical the Design Review Board can be when it comes to building on city land.

 

Aventura

In order to raise money for a charter school, the City of Excellence is ready to allow ads advertising casinos and other markets of vice.

 

North Bay Village

In order to build a new city hall, beautify JFK Causeway, and maybe build some parks, city officials will be asking residents for a loan in January.

 

COLUMNS

 

Murmurs

Sleepless Nights was an all-night culture fest—if you go to bed by midnight.

 

Wakefield

They may be offensive. They may be stupid. But Miami Herald message boards are alright in Rebecca Wakefield’s book.

 

The 411

Mickey Rourke gets in the middle of a catfight at Mokai, need we say more?

 

Reason for Season

The ultimate calendar of South Florida events from now until April 30.

 

Letters

Restaurant Listings

Film Capsules

Groundwork

 
 
Letters  

The Ping-Pong Match Continues

On Nov. 6, voters of the town of Surfside and the city of Miami Beach will vote on different ballot questions. It is rather ironic that Surfside Mayor Charlie Burkett keeps busy sending letters in a failed attempt to berate and humiliate me for being an active and concerned citizen [Letters, “Firing Line: Recording Misses One Shot at a Time,” published Oct. 25], while Mayor David Dermer of Miami Beach submits a letter addressing an important ballot question his city faces on Nov. 6 [Letters, “Say ‘Yes’ to Ethics” published Oct. 25]. It is also ironic how the Miami Beach question seeks to protect residents, while the Surfside ballot question seeks to protect elected officials by doubling the length of their terms in office, making them less accountable to residents.

Joe Graubart

Surfside

 

Reform Really Needed, Not That You Could Tell From That Biased Story

Regarding Erik Bojnansky’s story about the Bay Harbor Islands Charter Review Committee meeting [“Reform Unneeded,” published Oct. 25], I have to say that it reeks of uninspired bias on the part of the reporter. It may have been unintentional, but his attempt to appear neutral comes across as if he were a parrot on a perch of objectivity, safely mimicking what was said without any respect to context. 

The headline, “Reform Unneeded,” sounds more like a judgment call than an informational title. The reporter did not characterize the facts or climate of the meeting accurately. Rather, he seemed biased in favor of the sitting council members whose full titles were used accurately, without interpretation.

The reporter imparts an unspoken reverence for authority on the part of the committee and the council people sitting on the committee. For example, he surmises that Councilman Robert Yaffe indicated he was inclined to be in favor of term limits even though he left the meeting before the vote.

Councilman Yaffe’s voice on the council and committee is his vote — if does not exercise it, why would the reporter go out of his way to make a presumption about how Yaffe MIGHT have voted?

To further exemplify bias, the reporter consistently gave the committee the benefit of the doubt, whereas the innuendo and lack of context accompanying quotes from the Bay Harbor Islands residents, who were addressing the committee, served no purpose but to undermine their credibility. It was as if the writer was using the attendance of these residents to inject a little color into the story, at their expense.

Ms. K. Kennedy is described as a “promoter” for some reason, with no context as to why she would be described as such rather than as a resident, which is the role in which she was addressing the council. What significance does her job have here except to distract from her true purpose of addressing the committee?

Aurora Contreras actually spoke in favor of term limits at the meeting and agreed with Dr. Neuhut, yet her quote the reporter includes makes it seem as if she was speaking throughout the meeting in opposition of a revision that included term limits.

Finally, Teri D’Amico addressed the committee as a concerned resident of Bay Harbor Islands and during the meeting gave some of the most significant and convincing reasons for changes to the charter. Yet in Erik Bojnansky’s story, she was identified as nothing

more than an “activist” — whatever that means in this context — and was reduced to a giggling one at that.

Although I greatly appreciate the time and effort the SunPost puts in to send reporters to meetings that fall under the radar of many other local publications, if you are going to attend a meeting and write about it, PLEASE take the time to report accurately, factually and thoroughly about what happens — without injecting your own biases and background into the debate (intentionally or unintentionally).

Meetings like this are taking place unchecked throughout the county, often unwatched and unreported on by the media. But the kind of reporting in “Reform Unneeded” is not only not useful; it is damaging to the truth. Getting the facts straight and putting together a meaningful whole in context is what matters in telling the story.

Kenneth Shear

Bay Harbor Islands

 Comments? E-mail letters@miamisunpost.com.