|
Food Fight
Miami
Beach
tweaked its sidewalk café ordinance, and some restaurant
owners fear they may be put out of business
By Ben
Torter
 |
|
The
new ordinance bans these tacky food displays, but there
are other provisions that have restaurateurs fearing for
their bottom line. Photo by Julia Carfagno |
Tacky,
cheap and food court are words that hip city
dwellers might ordinarily associate with some long-forgotten
suburban mall of their childhood nightmares, but last week
these adjectives were used to describe Lincoln Road and
Ocean Drive.
The
barbed words flew from the tongues of various residents,
restaurant owners and community leaders at
Miami
Beach
City Hall during the second reading of a controversial new
sidewalk café ordinance that bans the prominent food
displays in front of
Ocean
Drive
and Lincoln Road restaurants as of Dec. 22.
Yet,
some restaurateurs said other rules in the pages-long
ordinance are difficult to understand. In fact, they believe
the dramatic fight against food displays was a smoke screen
to help slip through another aspect of the ordinance — one
that terminates old café permits for new restaurants and
could affect their bottom lines.
“The
only explanation that I can find for what happened is that
the administration wanted to divert attention from some of
the provisions they had added, such as termination of
sidewalk café permits upon sale,” said David Kelsey,
president of the South Beach Hotel and Restaurant
Association.
The
portion of the ordinance Kelsey referred to states that “a
sidewalk café permit may not be transferred and/or otherwise
assigned” and that “a new owner and/or operator” of a
business with a sidewalk café “will be required to apply for
and obtain a new permit.”
Kelsey
and others tried unsuccessfully to get that subsection
deleted from the ordinance. He believes it could lower the
resale value of restaurants by requiring them to meet a
state building code that counts outdoor seats in determining
how many toilets an establishment needs.
Although that code has been effective since March 2002, it
didn’t apply to pre-existing sidewalk cafés unless they
applied for major design changes. Kelsey argued that most of
the restaurants don’t have room to add more toilets, so
they’d have to remove outdoor seating — their bread and
butter.
Public
Works Director Fred Beckmann said that if a sidewalk café is
sold in the future, the city will enforce the current
plumbing code only if the new owner wants to add
seating.
“There is no change to what is currently required of a new
owner and/or operator,” Beckmann said in an e-mail. “No
additional plumbing fixtures are required if there’s no
change in the level of occupancy … and there is no space
reconfiguration, renovation or alteration. However, if the
occupancy level is changed or the space is reconfigured,
renovated or altered, the sidewalk café restaurant may be
required to install additional plumbing fixtures to comply
with the new building code.”
Kelsey is still suspicious.
“If
they think it means the same thing, then what is the
objection to taking it out?” he asked. “The word ‘terminate’
triggers the plumbing code.”
Some restaurant owners also stressed that the uncertainty
about whether new owners will be given the same number of
seats hurts the resale values of their establishments.
Allowing permits to be transferred, they argue, would help
maintain values.
City Manager Jorge Gonzalez, though, said the ground on
which sidewalk cafés are set up isn’t owned by the
restaurants.
“The sidewalk café belongs to the city,” Gonzalez said.
“We’ve managed up until now to be able to be accommodating
to all of those businesses that exist today, and I don’t
expect any reason why we would not continue to be that way,
but there are no rights that transfer for sale. They don’t
exist, and they’re not going to exist.”
At a
time when
Lincoln Road
and Ocean Drive were crime-ridden areas desperate for
redevelopment, restaurants were permitted to set up tables
and chairs on city-owned sidewalks. These sidewalk cafés
helped fuel the renaissance of Miami Beach and have become
an integral part of the
South
Beach
scene. The city currently leases portions of the enclosed
Lincoln Road or sidewalks of Ocean Drive to restaurants for
$15 per square foot per year.
But
critics say the success has reached a tipping point. They
say the sprawl of tables and chairs and busing stations
impede pedestrian flow on Ocean Drive and Lincoln Road, and
block Art Deco buildings, fountains and streetscape features
designed by such world-renowned local architects as Morris
Lapidus.
“Someone who’s not coming to eat might want to throw a penny
in the fountain,” Gonzalez said.
How to
legislate a balance has been the topic of at least a dozen
official city meetings during the past couple of years. Last
week, the commission was bombarded with testimony urging it
to pass the ordinance to more tightly regulate the sidewalk
cafés.
“You
don’t need thousands of people to tell you, it’s a food
court. You can’t get by,” said Robert Wennett, the developer
of 1111 Lincoln Road and a member of a committee that
advises on the character of the Cultural Arts Neighborhood
District Overlay, which includes
Lincoln Road.
Bill
Farkas, the executive director of the Miami Design
Preservation League, complained to the commission about
“cheerleaders” who try to pull people into the restaurants
and sidewalk cafés that employ them. Their presence, along
with the ever-growing expanse of tables and chairs on public
property, makes it difficult for people to walk. “There’s no
room to walk down the sidewalk on the western side [of
Ocean
Drive],”
Farkas said.
Ellen
Marchman, founder of the public relations firm Get Ink,
suggested the cafés are beginning to tarnish
Miami
Beach’s
image. “We used to be really glamorous,” she said.
Preservationist and former Beach Commissioner Nancy Leibman
provided some comic relief when she presented each
commissioner with a yellow rubber chicken, symbolic of food
displays, and reminiscent of the infamous rubber chicken
passed between her and former Mayor David Dermer.
“Get
rid of the live rubber chickens,” Liebman told
commissioners.
Kelsey
said he and his group of restaurants were blindsided at last
week’s commission meeting. The first reading of the sidewalk
café ordinance was Oct. 17. At that time, commissioners
agreed to leave the use of food displays up to individual
restaurant owners. After the November election, the makeup
of the commission changed to include new commissioners Ed
Tobin, Jonah Wolfson and Deede Wiethorn in place of Simon
Cruz, Michael Gongora and David Dermer. Kelsey wanted the
item to be heard again in January to give the new
commissioners two readings.
“It
may come back with a protest from the restaurants who have
food displays,” Kelsey said.
Many
restaurateurs believe the “food art” helps sell food,
especially to tourists who don’t speak English or Spanish
and can point to what they’d like.
But
not all the restaurants are upset that food displays have
been banned.
Graziano Sbroggio, who owns popular Lincoln Road spots like
Spris, Tiramesu, Le Bon, Segafredo and the Van Dyke Café,
doesn’t use food displays. Neither does Mark Soyka, founder
of Van Dyke Café and sole owner of News Café on Ocean Drive.
“Food
displays are, in my opinion, not very attractive,” said
Soyka, one of the city’s sidewalk café pioneers in the
1980s. “The food doesn’t look fresh, the food doesn’t look
right.”
Though
food displays have captured much of the focus of the
sidewalk café ordinance debate, they are only one aspect.
Some other highlights include:
•
Restaurants and bars will have to store tables and chairs
indoors overnight, unless they’re set up again by 11 a.m.
• The
city will no longer give them 24-hour warning notices for
site plan or life safety violations. Maximum fines increased
from $500 to $1,000, and repeat offenders can now have their
sidewalk café permits suspended or revoked.
• The
city manager is required to solicit input from neighbors of
restaurants that want to expand their outdoor seating.
•
Permit fees for restaurants with new sidewalk cafés are now
prorated for the first year.
Still,
the commission did not include all of the proposals in the
ordinance, including a controversial item that would have
limited outdoor seating to 50 percent of the area of each
block, and potential rules regulating how to safely store
gas cylinders used for outdoor heaters. The commission
referred the latter item to the Neighborhood Affairs
Committee for further discussion.
Though
the cylinders have been used in Miami Beach for at least 20
years, the fire department recently determined that they
have been stored in an unsafe manner. But at the urging of
restaurant industry members, who said the heaters are
necessary in cold winter months, the fire department agreed
not to write violations while a solution is being worked
out.
Mangoes Tropical Café owner David Wallack summed up the
sentiment of restaurant owners when he told commissioners,
“If you don’t have heaters, you’re empty, period.”
Comments? E-mail
ben@miamisunpost.com |