|

Some unsightly construction sites in Collins Park,
like the former Wolfie’s Restaurant, get extensions
provided they clean up their act. Photo by Angie
Hargot
|
With some big projects requesting
extensions of time across the city of Miami Beach, the Board
of Adjustment had its hands, and its agenda, full during a
meeting held Monday.
But
the possibility that some of those projects could be using
the extensions as a stalling tactic in a waning real estate
market has sparked concern.
Board members postulated that some of the projects before
them requesting extensions for various reasons could be
dragging their feet while they sell out their remaining
units. Meanwhile, their unsightly construction sites
continue to create an eyesore, angering many Beach
residents.
|
“If they want to
hire me I’ll paint it every fucking day.” |
“Our
neighborhood is blighted,” Ray Breslin, chairman of the
Collins Park Neighborhood Association, said. “I’d like to
see something being built there.”
Breslin was referring to the site where the famous Wolfie’s
restaurant once stood. The restaurant was knocked down and
new owners are constructing a six-story mixed-use
residential building there, reserving the ground floor for
commercial uses.
The
city set the building’s original completion date for April
4, 2005. Since then the project’s developer, Bert Brodsky of
New York, has requested and secured a slew of extensions,
the most recent requested at Monday’s meeting.
“There’s graffiti all over the building,” Breslin told the
board.
The
developer’s attorney, Alfredo Gonzalez, claimed that the
standing walls, often a target for graffiti artists, have
been painted several times, but the graffitists keep coming
back. Other construction sites in the Collins Park
neighborhood make similar graffiti targets.
“If
they want to hire me I’ll paint it every fucking day,” the
usually unruffled Breslin told the board, upset at claims
that the graffiti reappears hours after it is painted over.
“I am that dedicated and have that much passion about my
neighborhood.”
Breslin, who apologized for his slip of the tongue, also
said construction sites in the Collins Park area are not
properly screened from residents.
“This is a whole city block,” board member Roberto Datorre
said. “It’s an eyesore to the community. Because of the
market, we’re going to see a lot of projects stall.”
Datorre punctuated a sentiment that surfaced again and again
during the meeting. Could developers be requesting
extensions as Band-Aids for poorly executed projects, or to
simply buy time to sell more units?
With
that in mind, the board, faced with an agenda peppered with
one-year extension requests for these buildings, began
doling out modest six-month extensions, forcing the projects
to come back before the board at the end of that time if
need be.
The
patrolling of completion dates keeps projects moving, city
officials said.
“That came about in the wake of the North Beach project that
took 10 years to build and kind of looked like Beirut,”
Richard Lorber, planning and zoning manager for the city,
told the SunPost, referring to the Carillon Hotel.
When
the real estate market was hot, the need to assign
completion dates disappeared. But now Miami Beach is heading
into another phase.
“Every project until three years ago got a completion date,
and then large projects kept having to come in to extend the
completion date,” Lorber explained. “After yesterday’s
meeting it looks like they’re going back to that.”
Are
developers stalling? Lorber said that “there does seem to be
a lot of requests for extensions of time.”
“Basically the board in the past has specified a completion
date to ensure sites don’t sit vacant. They can ask for a
condition that the project be completed in such and such a
time, and add conditions that the project be screened or the
site cleaned up,” Lorber said. “It’s really governed by the
Florida building code. Some projects seem to be taking
longer.”
Lorber said he’s seen a slew of construction holdups that
can delay a project, ranging from last year’s concrete
shortage to hurricanes to just generally complicated project
designs — alluding to the possibility that it’s not just a
market slowdown that has so many projects on the agenda.
The
lengthy permitting process is another reason projects stall,
according to some industry professionals.
Attorneys for projects often go head-to-head with board
members over just how many months it takes to get a building
permit from the city.
The
trend of time extensions “does not surprise me,” said Lucia
Dougherty, attorney with Greenberg Traurig. “It takes a lot
of time to get a building permit.”
Dougherty came before the Board of Adjustment Monday
representing the Ankara project slated to replace the
current Creek Hotel at 2360 Collins Ave., and requesting a
modification to the proposed site plans from an apartment
building to a hotel.
She
says some projects originally planned as condo buildings are
cutting their losses in reaction to market speculation, and
changing their plans to office space. “One of my clients is
switching to retail,” Dougherty told the SunPost.
“Miami Beach is ideal for the switch to hotels, especially
with the closing of the Fontainebleau. The hotel business is
high right now in terms of occupancy and rate.”
Dougherty feels the extensions are, to some extent, in
reaction to a deteriorating real estate market. “Clearly,”
she said.
“I
don’t have to tell you about the market,” she advised the
board on Monday. She scored an 18-month extension for the
Ankara project to get a revised building permit.
The
trend doesn’t just concern speculators. Board member Datorre,
president of Miami Beach Community Development Corporation,
is a developer by trade, and so is doubly concerned.
“Last year or a year ago a lot of projects were in need of
extensions. It was in response to the real estate market,”
Datorre said. “I am in this business, and it has gone down.
A lot of these projects are not going to move forward. Some
have already started construction, and now you have an
eyesore. I understand it takes a long time for permitting.”
As long as the city sees that the project is moving forward,
Datorre said, there’s no cause for alarm. But sometimes
“they see the real estate market, and there’s concern.”
Even
with the widespread examination of a market downturn, it may
be too soon to tell the exact ramifications of the slump.
“It
seems to be as crowded as ever in this office,” Lorber said.
“I suppose you might slow down a project, [by requesting an
extension]. The board was concerned, and wanted to make sure
sites are moving along. So they keep bringing them back for
project reports, and making sure the sites stay clean.”
“Projects begin to do whatever is nominally required to
maintain their permits,” board member Larry Herrup said
during the meeting. With a look of distrust on his face he
labored through request after request, as developers, in
effect, traded the promise of cleaning up their sites for
six-month extensions.
“When you walk down the street all you see is plywood,”
Breslin said.
Projects are still under the gun, even without the Planning
Department’s new policing of progress. Building inspections
must occur every six months. “That way [staff] can keep the
board apprised of progress,” Lorber said. “With the
completion date [the project has] already spent a lot of
money, and the board can add what they feel is necessary.”
And,
as Datorre explained, the city does have options to combat a
potential feet-dragging trend: “by code enforcement or by
the awarding of adjustment, adding time limits,” he said.
“[The projects] lose rights that they have when they’re
doing nothing. If you’re doing the right thing it can be
extended for a year or six months. You get people
complaining about construction sites. That adds an extra
level of protection.
“The
reality is the market is not great,” he added. “You get
speculators or developers playing around with the property.”
The
board decided to place a special discussion item on current
development trends on the agenda for its May 4 meeting.
Comments? E-mail
angie@miamisunpost.com