|
Last
Updated:
Friday, August 29, 2008
|
Pay Raise for Elected Officials
Justified
This move by the City of
Miami voters will open the door for voters of other Florida
municipalities and governing bodies to begin realizing that the old
concept of “they are only part-time, let them serve for the honor”
is out the window.
By Seymour Gelber
Contributing Writer
Miracle of miracles---voters in
a city in these United States finally approved a raise for their
city commissioners. And where did it happen? In the City of Miami,
not only the poorest city in the country but one, in recent time,
that has been a totally dysfunctional city, riddled with
corruption, indictments and incompetence. To the point that
Governor Jeb Bush had to appoint a monitoring council to ride herd
on the city. It appears that new Mayor Manny Diaz deserves some
kind of superstar recognition for stabilizing the city.
Obviously Miami citizens,
appreciating the improvement in their government structure, rewarded
their commissioners with a bountiful raise from $5,000 to $58,200.
Quite a jump! About a zillion
percent increase, but it’s their money and their privilege.
But wait! Miami Herald
columnist Jim Defede is boiling because the City of Miami
commissioners spent $250,000 to educate the voters as to this and
several other ballot initiatives. “It’s sleazy” and “doesn’t pass
the smell test” says Defede because it “puts cash into the pockets
of every commissioner.” Yes, Jim, it does but you are missing the
big point.
This move by the City of Miami
voters will open the door for voters of other Florida municipalities
and governing bodies to begin realizing that the old concept of
“they are only part-time, let them serve for the honor” is out the
window. Governing is too complex to treat an elective position as
if it’s a hobby for the rich.
Take the City of Miami Beach,
hardly a city that can’t afford to dole out a respectable salary.
In over eighty years their city commissioner salaries have risen
about $5,000 dollars to their current $6,500 stipend. Those
increases come to about sixty bucks a year—coolie raises anywhere in
the world. Every raise brought to the vote of the Miami Beach
citizenry has been rejected. This wage scale has been the custom in
Florida rather than the exception. How come?
The obvious answer is that
citizens don’t trust government, and this way they can answer back.
Of course, they could vote the bad guys out of office, but our
voters are cynical enough to believe that, despite their promises to
the contrary, the successors won’t be any better. And they might
be right about that, too. But why, as the old adage goes, cut off
your nose to spite your face? Maybe, just maybe, the positions
might attract a better quality office holder if a respectable salary
is offered.
Defede also criticizes Miami
City Commission tactics of placing this on the ballot during an
off-year election when a small voter turnout was certain, and
“filling the airwaves with propaganda.” C’mon Jim, every ballot
initiative is placed with the idea of winning over the voters, not
losing. And spending the city’s money, advertising what is at
stake, is proper and necessary.
Back in 1997, as mayor of Miami
Beach, I placed a city commission raise on the ballot although Beach
voters had rejected it several times in the past. I did it in a
very calculated, shrewd manner, sandwiching the pay raise between
two other more popular measures. Those two issues concerning term
limits of elected officials, both likely to pass, might just carry
the pay raise, I thought.
Rather than following the City
of Miami strategy of highly publicizing the ballot proposal, I chose
to low-key it by not campaigning for it, figuring a stealth campaign
would allow it to slip by quietly. My only effort was to submit a
dignified letter-to-the- editor reminding citizens to approve it.
At the time I was certain that approaching the issue by not arousing
opposition was the smart way
Another aspect of my stealth
strategy was to only increase the salary minimally so that people
wouldn’t be too upset. It was a galling defeat! I learned that
whatever tactic taken is always a calculated political risk.
If I had been as smart as Miami
City Commissioner Johnny Winton who had shepherded Miami’s proposal
to victory, maybe ours too would have succeeded. With no disrespect
to the City of Miami, our Miami Beach City Commission deserved it a
lot more.
So, Mr. Jim Defede, look at it
this way. This raise will do worlds of good for the self-esteem of
Miami’s elected leaders. It’s bound to pay off in a higher level of
quality service, and perhaps even better candidates. It will also
open the door wide for Miami Beach citizens (and other
jurisdictions) to reconsider their miserly attitude toward those who
govern.
And a private note to Miami
Beach Mayor Dermer: This may be the time for you to look at this
issue again. As for help, David, avoid me at all costs. Then
again, don’t look for any help from Jim Defede, either.
And so it goes.
|