Twin Rejections
Zoning Board
Votes No After Residents Oppose Developer
and Nightclub Application
“Living in this area is a pain in the ass because it’s noisy
and commercial.”
By Ryan Brown
Residents of
Miami’s District 3 packed City Hall to voice their opposition to
a nightclub and a high-rise being constructed in their
neighborhood.
Both projects
ended up being rejected on Oct. 30 by the Miami Zoning Board.
Luis and Mercy
Palomo wanted property located at 1292 SW 21st Terrace and 2149
SW 13th Ave. in East Shenandoah to be rezoned from single-family
residences (R-1) to restricted commercial (C-1). Essentially,
this would allow a commercial building to be constructed. C-1
zoning allows 150 units per acre; R-1, only nine units per acre.
“The design of
the project calls for a residential building tower over a
parking pedestal, which is set back and lined with townhouse
units,” A. Vicky Garcia-Toledo, the Palomo’s attorney, wrote to
the city of Miami on June 7.
But neighbors
appearing at the meeting, who live in single-family-zoned areas,
argued that traffic would become unbearable due to the density
of the proposed building, making the area more dangerous for
drivers and children. One resident even claimed that
Commissioner Joe Sanchez, who represents District 3, was against
having “high buildings” in that neighborhood.
“This zoning
change will allow 150 units, which is 17 times what is now
allowed,” said Luis Fernandez, a lawyer working pro bono on
behalf of The Vizcaya Homeowners Association, the group leading
the resistance against the development.
Most residents
appearing at the meeting feared that approving the upzoning
could create a “domino effect,” opening the floodgates to more
big commercial projects and eventually turning a quiet
neighborhood, a “gem,” as one resident called it, into a
commercial area.
Also against
the idea: the Planning Department, which stated that SW 21st
Terrace “is low-density residential, specifically
single-family residential.” The Planning Advisory Board also
voted to deny on Sept. 6.
“A few people
support the project,” said Demitri Mancos, a resident of the
neighborhood, “but pretty much everyone opposes it.”
The Zoning
Board decided to recommend the city deny this application.
Luis Palomo,
the developer of the project, lives in a small house on the
property where the proposed project would be built. “I’m
confident the city will allow me to build this project,” Palomo
told the SunPost Wednesday, noting that despite the
Zoning Board’s recommended denial, the mayor and City Commission
have ultimate say. “This block is a disgrace,” Palomo adds.
“Look at this piece of shit!” he says, pointing to his house.
Palomo insists
the project will benefit the neighborhood. “Living in this area
is a pain in the ass because it’s noisy and commercial,” he
said. “If the project is built there will be a buffer between
the street [Coral Way] and the houses.”
Another
proposed project on the agenda: a Honduran nightclub in the
heart of Little Havana, at 760 NW Fourth St. This time the
Planning Board recommended approval for the nightclub since it
was “near the Miami River and major public and entertainment
facilities near the downtown area … will benefit by having a
nightclub nearby,” stated a staff report.
But the
nightclub application, made by Luis Uva of D.P. Realty Corp.,
also met opposition, not only from neighbors but from the Police
Department as well.
Little Havana’s
NET Administrator, Pablo Canton, and Commander Jose Alfonso of
the Miami Police Department, pointed out that over the past 10
years, drug dealers have been virtually eliminated from that
area. If a nightclub opened, they believe, drug dealing
would resume with the influx of people visiting the area for the
purpose of partying.
Alfonso also
noted that the police usually receive nonstop complaints from
neighbors when a nightclub is established near homes. “The
clientele goes off into the neighborhoods,” he said.
One Little
Havana resident believed the club would introduce an additional
element of crime: “I really think that this will attract
prostitution,” she said.
Another problem
for the club is its lack of ample parking. The Zoning Board made
it clear that parking is already a problem in too many parts of
the city.
Uva’s requests
for both a parking variance and a “special exception” to open a
nightclub were rejected by the Zoning Board.
Comments?
E-mail
letters@miamisunpost.com.