|
Miami Beach
Ch, Ch, Ch, Changes?
Building Department Director Tom Velazquez has used a heavy hand
to implement changes in his department
By Ben
Torter
Squeaky-clean and efficient are three words that have probably
never been used by a sane person to describe the Miami Beach
Building Department.
The office
is legendary for rude employees, disorganization such as losing
building plans, long delays in permitting processes and other
major inefficiencies.
The arrests
of Chief Electrical Inspector Thomas Ratner in September of 2006,
and last month of Mohammad Partovi, Andres Villarreal and Henry
Johnson on charges covering the spectrum of bribery, official
misconduct, racketeering and money laundering, suggest problems
beyond mismanagement. Granted, Johnson worked for the Planning
Department, but the departments are closely linked in the building
process.
Thomas
Velazquez was hired to head the Building Department and straighten
it out after 16 years in
Broward
County,
most recently as a building official. But sources close to the
city question City Manager Jorge Gonzalez’s choice to head a
troubled department, citing Velazquez’s checkered past and some
decisions he’s made since taking over. One of those was giving
Villarreal more power and naming him employee of the month in
November 2006. Villarreal left the city under a cloud of sexual
harassment rumors about six months before being arrested.
Velazquez
shrugged off his unpopularity within the department as a sign he’s
doing a good job.
“I’m not
here to win a sympathy contest,” Velazquez said. “I’m here to fix
the Building Department.”
One policy
he implemented was no personal cell phone use on the job, and he
hung “no cell phone” signs throughout the department as constant
reminders. He explained that he was appalled to find employees at
the front desk talking on their phones and ignoring clients.
“These
permit clerks treated people like they were doing them a favor,”
Velazquez said. “If you need to make a phone call during break or
have an emergency, fine, we’re all humans.”
Swapping out
a traditional time card machine for a handprint reader is another
obvious change Velazquez implemented.
“Attendance
used to be terrible,” Velazquez said. “It used to be one employee
would punch the card for another. Who knew when you were coming or
going? Now, unless you cut off your hand, someone else can’t punch
for you. Amazingly, attendance is much better.”
Then there’s
overtime.
“When I came
here overtime was $350,000 per year, and I’ve gotten it down more
than 40 percent,” Velazquez said.
Overtime pay
is the subject of a current grievance filed by the Communications
Workers of America Local 3178 on behalf of nine building
inspectors.
“Tom
Velazquez is treating us unfairly,” states the grievance, which
was filed March 10. “Our department rules provided for a four-hour
minimum overtime inspection (that contractors paid for) regardless
of the time actually spent on the job and regardless of it being
contiguous to the shift. Tom Velazquez has decided not to pay four
hours minimum overtime inspections. This change in the rules was
never discussed with the union.”
Chief Deputy
City Attorney Donald Papy said the grievance process is in the
beginning stage of being addressed by Assistant Director Graciela
Escalante. If she can’t resolve the matter, the grievance moves
through the labor relations process, and possibly eventually to
arbitration.
Escalante
didn’t return phone calls or an e-mail for comment, but Velasquez
read her response, which he said was sitting in the Building
Department Wednesday afternoon waiting for someone from the union
to pick it up.
“This
grievance is denied,” stated Escalante’s response. “The department
gave the employees notice on Jan. 8 that the existing language in
the CWA union contract, Sec 7.9 that reads Comeback Pay, would be
enforced.”
According to
Velazquez, the overtime was being used as a built-in bribery
technique. He explained that inspectors would finish all but maybe
five minutes of an inspection and then tell a contractor the work
couldn’t be finished unless the contractor requested the inspector
stay overtime. Then they’d stay five minutes and leave.
“If I’m an
inspector without much ethics, I’ll find a way to turn down your
inspection, but I’ll be back at 4 o’clock if you call and I’ll get
paid four hours overtime,” Velazquez said, adding that there were
inspectors making an extra $3,000 per two-week pay period this
way. He said he doesn’t mind what he deems necessary overtime, but
plans can no longer be taken home.
An outside
source who works closely with the Building Department and spoke on
condition of anonymity said he was aware that Ratner was abusing
the system as Velazquez explained, but didn’t believe others were.
“We probably
have 40 to 50 grievances at all different steps in most
departments of the city of
Miami Beach,”
said Richard McKinnon, president of the CWA Local 3178. “We are
not prepared to comment on that particular grievance at this
time.”
Another
departmental change Velazquez cites is that supervisors now track
plans, have them reviewed by more than one employee and approve
them for expedited reviews. In the past, these processes were more
like a free-for-all. Ratner, Villarreal and Partovi were all
supervisors.
Velazquez
has made a lot of enemies in Miami Beach who question his reforms
and his management style. A few have sent the SunPost
e-mails and manila envelopes full of accusations, many of them
substantiated in court records. Documents in Velazquez’s personnel
file with the city of Miami Beach show his superiors were aware
when they hired him that he was convicted of two DUIs in 1996 and
declared bankruptcy in 2001, allegedly to protect himself from his
ex-wife. He was also forthcoming with the city about a 1983 car
theft charge that was dismissed almost immediately. He said he
bought the car from a man whose ex-wife reported it stolen to
screw with him.
“Sure I have
a past,” Velazquez said. “I’m not proud of it.”
His enemies
question why the city would hire a man with a less than stellar
past to head a department plagued with corruption.
Assistant
City Manager Hilda Fernandez said she wasn’t familiar with
Velazquez’s file, but that that his background was thoroughly and
very publicly vetted before he was chosen.
Said
Fernandez: “We’ve got really good employees here that are being
tarnished by a few greedy people.”
Comments? E-mail
ben@miamisunpost.com
|